Be fruitful and multiply, even by IVF
Tuesday, July 11th, 2006So God created man in his [own] image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
Genesis 1:27-28
On the matter of IVF, some Christians are pitilessly cold-hearted.
There are undoubtedly serious moral questions raised by this medical miracle. Embryos are human, and I agree with the concerns Catholics and other Christians have about their destruction. IVF clinics and prospective parents should give deep thought to how they treat human embryos — embryo adoption has begun in America, that’s a great thing. Destroying embryos that might be genetically ill is also morally questionable. Raising these questions is necessary and I hope will lead to moral outcomes.
But if there are those who seriously see no difference between the miracle of IVF and the horror of the abortion industry, then I would suggest they know nothing about humanity, life or why life is sacred. There’s something cruelly legalistic (in the worst possible sense of that word) about manipulating the teachings of Jesus to reach an outcome that would deny life.
IVF clinics are bringing life to children who would not otherwise exist and they are helping to make happy loving families where before there was just barrenness and heartbreak.
There is no life in a barren womb. No life is not pro-life.
“That which I would not, that I do!”
Good medicines kill patients, good policemen and good soldiers kill innocents. Speeding ambulances kill pedestrians.
Often when we try to do good, harm comes as a side effect — people die. We walk through the valley of the shadow of death. Death is all around us, that’s why life is sacred.
That’s why doctors fight to give Granny a few hours of life. That’s why ten guilty men go free rather than we convict a single innocent one. That’s why hundreds of volunteers will search for one climber lost in the snow, why ships and helicopters scour the ocean for one lost sailor. That’s why a platoon of US Marines will go into battle to rescue one of their own, even if it means they will take greater casualties in the process!
We spend millions — the equivalent of lifetimes of work — and risk lives, for even the possibility of saving a single life, even of adding a single day to a single life.
We are moral people, that is the Lord’s work.
Replenish the earth, and subdue it
In the midst of the shadow stretching infinitely in every direction, here is this precious, fragile, little flame of life. That is why life, every moment of it, is sacred.
Bringing life to children, and children to families, is the Lord’s work. He commanded it.
And for some people, bringing life into the world is hard. The doctors counsel them not to, but they bond with every embryo, investing their hopes, praying to God to protect this tiny life. Most of the time, the embryos die — when they die, there’s blood. And the parents grieve and they weep, but they try again and again.
It’s excruciating.
But still they persist, because life is so very precious.
The quest to bring life into the world has consumed lives and fortunes. The parents learn bitterly what our ancient forbears knew, that life triumphs for but a moment and death is always at our shoulder.
And there are those Christians who would say ‘let there be no life here, it contradicts our philosophies.’
How are such cold hearts, who would deny life when it conflicts with their philosophies, any different from the utilitarians — the Peter Singers — who would destroy life when it conflicts with their philosophies? How is the philosophy that says you may not cultivate embryonic life, because the likelihood the embryo will die is high, different from the philosophy that says you must not allow a child to be born, because the likelihood it will suffer severe illness or loss of quality of life is high? Each philosophy results in life denied.
Which if us, if offered the option of ‘no life’ or ‘a chance of life’ would choose ‘no life’.

